Session 5 Comparison Result

Concrete Learning Process and practice

Experimentation
Information Collection
Analysis
Education and training
Information Transfer
HKUGA
50
61
66
45
57
University
50
59
77
79
63
Power Supply
54
64
60
95
70








Supportive Learning Environment

Psychological safety
Appreciation of difference
Openness to new ideas
Time For reflection
HKUGA
86
57
71
51
University
69
50
68
51
Power Supply
60
39
54
29

Learning Organization Scores Summary

Leadership that reinforces learning
Learning process
Learning environment
HKUGA
83
55
66
University
65
65
59
Power Supply
80
68
45


I had put all the organization's mark into these table so that I can have an easy comparison 
between these result. First of all, under of "Concrete Learning Process and practice", we can realize that these three organizations have roughly same performance within the following three parts ---experimentation, information collection and analysis. For the information transfer, they still have a roughly similar performance in this field. But, for the education and training, we found that Power Supply has the best performance among these three while the University is the second one and the HKUGA is having the least performance. From this result, we can know that Power Supply is a place for the employee to receive an excellent training and development and HKUGA is just a organization that force the employees to work  in a "straight-forward" manner. 

For the Supportive Learning Environment, we can see that HKUGA has the best performance in all four aspects while the Power Supply has the least performance indeed. And of course, University's performance is in between them. What is the reasons cause such pattern? It is because  HKUGA is a organization consists of plenty of employees that come from HKU. They work for HKUGA for internship. HKUGA has a great expectation on the internship helpers. Thus, they will not provide any training for them, but, they are pleased to see the students keeping flowing new ideas and bring new breakthrough in the project. Therefore, it is absolutely a good place for supportive learning environment. They encourage their initiative in completing task. 
For the Power Supply, on the other hand, is opposite to that of HKUGA. The main reason is that all the task inside the Power Supply are almost the same everyday. They have a fixed regulations and guideline. To ensure the safety, all the regulations should be strictly followed. Thus, they have to do the same things everyday without too many variety. 

For the last session, Learning Organization Scores Summary, as mentioned before, HKUGA is a good place to learn since it needs inter-flow with the others. Therefore, it gets the highest mark in the learning environment while Power Supply get the lowest score   as it only requires the same job duties everyday. Beside, HKUGA is also the best place that leadership can reinforce learning. As it is always require the student in completing a task by generating a new concept, idea or even technology. Thus, a good leader is crucial. Although Power Supply is an organization that require the same daily job duties. It's still better to have a leader. In case of any problems, a leader should handle and "shoulder" all the responsibilities indeed.
  

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Jack,
    Thank you for the particular explanation about our comparison chart which gives me a clearer vision about our organization and the meaning behind these scores. I agree with you that HKUGA is a organization consists of plenty of employees and is a good place to learn since it needs inter-flow with the others so that the HKUGA gets the highest scores in Learning Organization Scores Summary and Supportive Learning Environment. I think my organization should learn from yours to get higher scores in these 2 parts.

    ReplyDelete