Ricky’s target organization is Prudential Hong Kong Ltd while Milky’s organization is her university. And Cissy choose the Global IELTS Hangzhou branch as target organization. See from three tables, Ricky and Milky seem to get the same result. I’ll analyzes the similarities and differences below.
Concrete Learning Processes and Practices
| |||||
Experimentation
|
Information collection
|
Analysis
|
Education and training
|
Information transfer
| |
Ricky
|
46
|
75
|
51
|
86
|
50
|
Milky
|
46
|
75
|
51
|
86
|
50
|
Cissy
|
64
|
68
|
49
|
81
|
66
|
The first table displays the “concrete learning processes and practices” in these three organizations. The organizations which Milky and Ricky choose get a lower score than Cissy in the respect of experimentation, which means Cissy’s organization are more easily to try new things and new methods. And Cissy’s organization takes an advantage in information collection and transfer. When it comes to analysis, the organization Cissy joins in is weak. All originations attach importance to education and training.
Supportive Learn Environment
| ||||
Psychological safety
|
Appreciation of differences
|
Openness to new ideas
|
Time to reflection
| |
Ricky
|
63
|
50
|
50
|
60
|
Milky
|
63
|
50
|
50
|
60
|
Cissy
|
63
|
50
|
50
|
60
|
The second form mainly focused on supportive learning environment. We three have same score in above four aspects. The three organizations appreciate new ideas and accept differences to some extent. What’s more, our organizations give reflection to new and different things in a short time.
Learning Organization Scores Summary
| |||
Leadership that reinforces learning (composite)
|
Learning process composite
|
Learning environment composite
| |
Ricky
|
58
|
61
|
55
|
Milky
|
58
|
61
|
55
|
Cissy
|
60
|
65
|
55
|
The last table is a summary of Learning organization scores. Cissy’s organization has a higher score in learning process composite, and the leadership that reinforces learning. Maybe the reason is that GLOBAL IELTS is a training institute. As to learning environment, the score of three organizations rank in the low class.
In a conclusion, these three organization need to do more efforts in becoming a learning organization.
Appreciate your work. And I think your analysis can be a little bit deeper!
ReplyDeleteHi, Jack, thanks for your recommendation and I will make some change discuss it with my group.
DeleteBy the way, I think maybe it is because our result are almost same, so it is hard for us to make comparison.
DeleteHi Cissy,
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing the comparison result of your organizations. It offers a clear vision about some points of your organization. But I'm agree with Jack that your comparison must be a little deeper even the result of your organization is almost the same. I think you can talk something more about the meaning behind the figures. And you have mentioned that the score of three organizations rank in the low class, maybe you can explain about the reason and how to make the scores higher.
Hi Makino,
DeleteThank you for your good suggestion.